Download them, try them out, and report any bugs you find. They’ll install alongside your existing Chromium browsers not replace them. Our binaries for Linux are built regularly and are publicly available. Testing is always helpful, and open to a broader number of people. Contact us and we’ll be happy to help you get started. If you are a browser hacker, you can consider contributing code or reviews directly to our development branch on github. There are many ways that you can help, and we appreciate all contributions. Each of those choices guarantees that you will spend more time troubleshooting and will encounter interoperability, performance, and maintenance problems. The closer you try to approximate what native solutions provide, the higher the costs. Whichever specific tradeoffs you choose, there are costs. The fact that the one browser which fails to support MathML happens to be Chromium ( Chrome alone has the most market share) further complicates things.Īs an end user, you might need to switch browsers whenever you wanted to view a document containing mathemtical text.Īs an organization producing documents with mathematical content, or working with mathemtical content, you would be forced to understand and make a selection from a potentially complex series of tradeoffs. However, lacking a single browser implementation for rendering leaves a large number of difficult problems and complexity. With an implementation, all of the tools and integrations fit together nicely and allow the creation, sharing, and consumption of mathematical text.
0 kommentar(er)
